Publisher: North China Economic Time
HOME >> Life & Style

PETA Sparks Controversy, Linking Meat Consumption to "Supremacy"

Animal rights organization PETA recently ignited a firestorm on social media by asserting a connection between meat consumption and the concept of "supremacy." The group's tweet, which stated that supremacy is the reason people believe it's acceptable to eat animals, drew immediate criticism and mockery from meat-eaters online. Many responded defiantly, emphasizing their right to consume meat and questioning PETA's logic.

Some users challenged PETA's stance by pointing out that animals also consume other animals, prompting the organization to clarify its position. PETA argued that humans, unlike animals driven by survival instincts, possess the capacity for ethical decision-making, making the consumption of meat a moral issue. The organization has previously accused meat-eaters of "speciesism," the belief in human superiority over other species.

Adding fuel to the controversy, PETA president Ingrid Newkirk recently updated her will with some unusual provisions. Newkirk has requested that upon her death, her body be used for a "human barbecue," her skin be made into leather goods, and various body parts be distributed to individuals and groups to promote animal rights. PETA defended Newkirk's decision, stating that her "bodily bequests" aim to inspire animal advocates and challenge the notion of speciesism.

PETA president Ingrid Newkirk

In response to the online backlash, Newkirk described boasting about meat consumption as "pathetic," emphasizing the complex lives and needs of animals. She urged individuals to adopt a compassionate approach and choose non-violent meals.